Scolding oil companies for being oil companies is wrong way to go
It seems to have become a standard complaint lately on the part of the eco-aware, that the big oil companies are not doing enough to invest their mega-huge profits into research and development of renewable energy alternatives. The latest salvo is from the oil-enriched descendants of John D. Rockefeller, who are publicly scolding the management of ExxonMobil for being so intransigent about the global warming crisis.
Descendants of legendary oil tycoon John D Rockefeller have accused ExxonMobil of adopting a myopic approach towards alternative sources of energy and of refusing to engage in any meaningful discussion about the future of the planet.
At a feisty press conference in the penthouse suite of a luxury Manhattan hotel, members of the billionaire Rockefeller family complained that the world’s biggest oil company has repeatedly declined to listen to concerns about the direction of the business which has its roots in their ancestor’s 19th-century Standard Oil empire.
On the heels of this, The Guardian reports that Shell is following in ExxonMobil’s “damn the Earth, full oil speed ahead!” footsteps by backing out of a wind-power project in order to free up money to invest in more oil exploration.
The future of the world’s largest offshore wind farm and a symbol of Britain’s renewable energy future was thrown into doubt last night after it emerged that Shell was backing out of the project and indicated it would prefer to invest in more lucrative oil schemes.
I’m as frustrated as anyone, well as most aware people at least, that the oil companies are pillaging the global economy with their truly gross profits and also pillaging the global climate in their day-to-day business. Nonetheless, I don’t understand why we would expect ExxonMobil and its cohort ilk to be the ones to come to our renewable energy rescue. The managers of these corporations have succeeded so well by knowing how to manage the oil business (and to grease the hands of politicians, of course). That doesn’t mean they are the best managers for renewable energy businesses. If their hearts aren’t in it, why ask them to do it? Instead, it makes much more sense to me to tax the hell out of the bastards–and I say that purely, dispassionately, and objectively on the basis of the economic theory of accounting for negative externalities–and use the money to conduct government-funded R&D or to grant tax breaks to private efforts to improve and implement renewable energy alternatives.
There are two advantages to this. First, as I suggested above, the oil executives are probably the wrong people to be running renewable energy endeavors. They might do an okay job at it, but we don’t want an okay job done, we want the best conceivable job done and we’re more likely to get it when the leaders of the effort are passionate about what they’re doing for additional reasons than the desire for maximum profit. Second, if ExxonMobil takes $1 billion or $5 billion or whatever of their planned $25 billion capital investment fund and puts it into renewable energy, that helps out in the development and deployment of renewables; but it does virtually nothing to reign in ExxonMobil’s position as economic pillager par excellence. It doesn’t put a dent in the profits they have available for ongoing bribing–legal or otherwise–of politicians. It doesn’t put a dent in their attitude that they can and should extract every last penny from the consumer that they possibly can, homelessness and hunger be damned. A tax smack-down not only allows funds to be shifted to where they desperately need to go, but it helps out on these other economic and social justice fronts as well.
Let the oil companies be oil companies. But at the same time constrain the sphere of power (economic, political, environmental, and social) that they rule over. That way you get two birds with one stone.
In Call of the Reed Warbler, Charles Massy’s stunning observations of interaction between nature and society is nothing short of eye opening. “By arrogantly having placed ourselves outside the functional operating parameters of Earth’s systems, we now see nature and the Earth as separate from us and so just available for use – while all the time…Read More
It’s more than an oxymoron. Massive Small is a framework for urban development that can make cities more sustainable and resilient. But how does it work and does it make sense for the future? The following excerpt is from Making Massive Small Change by Kelvin Campbell. It has been adapted for the web. The Massive Small…Read More
When our stomachs growl, we eat. When we feel like we’re about to burst, we stop eating. Our bodies have the incredible ability to recognize and adjust to changes in the environment and within itself, and sometimes knows what’s best for us without us even realizing. The following is an excerpt from Nourishment by Fred…Read More
Are you new to the Chelsea Green community and aren’t sure which book to read first? Or maybe you’re a long-time fan and want to continue your binge-reading but need some fresh ideas. Regardless of how you got here, we can help! From the enlightening and thought-provoking to the quirky and fun, we, the Chelsea…Read More
For centuries, humans have had a very strong interest in oil and it’s only getting more intense. Our dependency is reaching a concerning level which Matthieu Auzanneau speaks to in his book Oil, Power, and War. The following article was written by Frank Kaminski and was published on Resilience.org. In Oil, Power, and War, French…Read More