- Chelsea Green - http://www.chelseagreen.com/content -

Save the Planet—Eat More Beef

Posted By dpacheco On January 15, 2010 @ 12:04 pm In Garden & Agriculture | No Comments

Methane emissions from cattle account for more greenhouse gases in the atmosphere than transportation. The obvious conclusion to draw here is that, if you’re really concerned with emissions and climate change, you should cut all beef out of your diet. Just cut it right out.

Well… yes and no.

From Time magazine:

So how can Coleman and Damrosch believe that adding livestock to their farm will help the planet? Cattleman Ridge Shinn has the answer. On a wintry Saturday at his farm in Hardwick, Mass., he is out in his pastures encouraging a herd of plump Devon cows to move to a grassy new paddock. Over the course of a year, his 100 cattle will rotate across 175 acres four or five times. “Conventional cattle raising is like mining,” he says. “It’s unsustainable, because you’re just taking without putting anything back. But when you rotate cattle on grass, you change the equation. You put back more than you take.”

It works like this: grass is a perennial. Rotate cattle and other ruminants across pastures full of it, and the animals’ grazing will cut the blades — which spurs new growth — while their trampling helps work manure and other decaying organic matter into the soil, turning it into rich humus. The plant’s roots also help maintain soil health by retaining water and microbes. And healthy soil keeps carbon dioxide underground and out of the atmosphere.

Compare that with the estimated 99% of U.S. beef cattle that live out their last months on feedlots, where they are stuffed with corn and soybeans. In the past few decades, the growth of these concentrated animal-feeding operations has resulted in millions of acres of grassland being abandoned or converted — along with vast swaths of forest — into profitable cropland for livestock feed. “Much of the carbon footprint of beef comes from growing grain to feed the animals, which requires fossil-fuel-based fertilizers, pesticides, transportation,” says Michael Pollan, author of The Omnivore’s Dilemma. “Grass-fed beef has a much lighter carbon footprint.” Indeed, although grass-fed cattle may produce more methane than conventional ones (high-fiber plants are harder to digest than cereals, as anyone who has felt the gastric effects of eating broccoli or cabbage can attest), their net emissions are lower because they help the soil sequester carbon.

Read the whole article here. [1]

 

Related Articles:


Article printed from Chelsea Green: http://www.chelseagreen.com/content

URL to article: http://www.chelseagreen.com/content/save-the-planeteat-more-beef/

URLs in this post:

[1] Read the whole article here.: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1953692,00.html

[2] How to Cook the Perfect, Tender Grassfed Steak: http://www.chelseagreen.com/content/how-to-cook-the-perfect-tender-grassfed-steak/

[3] What’s the Deal With Vegetarianism?: http://www.chelseagreen.com/content/whats-the-deal-with-vegetarianism/

[4] Hog Hotels: Animal Confinement and Big Pharma Farms: http://www.chelseagreen.com/content/hog-hotels-animal-confinement-and-big-pharma-farms/

Follow us
Get every new post delivered to your inbox
Join millions of other followers
Powered By WPFruits.com