- Chelsea Green - www.chelseagreen.com -
NY Times Magazine Meets Radical Homemakers
Posted By dpacheco On March 15, 2010 @ 10:36 am In Simple Living | 1 Comment
What does raising chickens in your backyard have to do with feminism? Everything. say the radical homemakers, a new breed of women (and men) who reject society’s impulse to box them in with binary definitions like breadwinner/housewife. They grow much of their own food, mend their own clothes, and, most importantly, are part of a supportive community of sustainability-minded individuals who refuse to be mindless consumers. They’re back-to-the-landers writ small, and somehow they’re making it work.
From the New York Times magazine:
Four women I know—none of whom know one another—are building chicken coops in their backyards. It goes without saying that they already raise organic produce: my town, Berkeley, Calif., is the  Vatican of locavorism, the high church of  Alice Waters. Kitchen gardens are as much a given here as indoor plumbing. But chickens? That ups the ante. Apparently it is no longer enough to know the name of the farm your eggs came from; now you need to know the name of the actual bird.
All of these gals—these chicks with chicks—are stay-at-home moms, highly educated women who left the work force to care for kith and kin. I don’t think that’s a coincidence: the omnivore’s dilemma has provided an unexpected out from the feminist predicament, a way for women to embrace homemaking without becoming Betty Draper. “Prior to this, I felt like my choices were either to break the glass ceiling or to accept the gilded cage,” says Shannon Hayes, a grass-fed-livestock farmer in upstate New York and author of “Radical Homemakers,” a manifesto for “tomato-canning feminists,” which was published last month.
Hayes pointed out that the original “problem that had no name” was as much spiritual as economic: a malaise that overtook middle-class housewives trapped in a life of schlepping and shopping. A generation and many lawsuits later, some women found meaning and power through paid employment. Others merely found a new source of alienation. What to do? The wages of housewifery had not changed—an increased risk of depression, a niggling purposelessness, economic dependence on your husband—only now, bearing them was considered a “choice”: if you felt stuck, it was your own fault. What’s more, though today’s soccer moms may argue, quite rightly, that caretaking is undervalued in a society that measures success by a paycheck, their role is made possible by the size of their husband’s. In that way, they’ve been more of a pendulum swing than true game changers.
Enter the chicken coop.
Photo:  Katherine Wolkoff/Art + Commerce, for the New York Times.
Article printed from Chelsea Green: www.chelseagreen.com
URL to article: http://www.chelseagreen.com/content/ny-times-meets-radical-homemakers/
URLs in this post:
 Vatican: http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/r/roman_catholic_church/index.html
 Alice Waters: http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/w/alice_waters/index.html?inline=nyt-per
 Read the whole article here.: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/14/magazine/14fob-wwln-t.html?ref=magazine
 Katherine Wolkoff/Art + Commerce: http://www.artandcommerce.com/AAC/C.aspx?VP=SlideShow_VPage&IAPA=1&STY=A&L4=2U1XC58OB
 Meet the Radical Homemakers: http://www.chelseagreen.com/content/meet-the-radical-homemakers/
 The Grassfarmer Meets the Radical Homemaker: http://www.chelseagreen.com/content/the-grassfarmer-meets-the-radical-homemaker/