Chelsea Green Publishing

Chelsea Green Blog

Rahm vs. Dean: Round Two

Rahm vs. Dean on healthcare reform: Rahm Emanuel has always favored weaker legislation, with no public option, or a trigger that, in practice, would achieve the same effect as no public option. Howard Dean, on the other hand, favors real healthcare reform with a robust public option. Howard Dean is not alone. Survey after survey shows that 3/4 of Americans would prefer to be able to choose between a private insurer and a government-run plan like Medicare.

Why is Rahm so eager to bargain away something that the overwhelming majority of Americans want? Because in the Rahm-iverse, we should only try to achieve what’s realistic (“realistic,” in this case, being anything that doesn’t step on the toes of insurance company CEOs).

What I want to know, Rahm, is whatever happened to hope and change? Howard Dean hasn’t forgotten that the American people voted a commanding majority of Democrats into Congress and elected a Democratic president. We did that because we want real reform. And if our elected officials actually voted what their constituents actually wanted, then that reform would become the new “realistic.”

It’s the 50-state strategy all over again: Howard Dean was right and Rahm Emanuel was wrong.

Here’s Cenk Uygur, host of The Young Turks, for The Huffington Post:

Now, we’re in the second round. This time it’s the health care debate. Rahm Emanuel has been pushing for a weaker version of reform from the beginning. In his defense, he believes he is focusing on what is doable (nearly the same thing he said during the previous House elections). Emanuel has argued for a trigger from the beginning of the debate and seems to think that a public option is not realistic in this political environment.

Howard Dean has instead argued for a stronger version of health care reform. He believes the country is persuadable (the same position he had in the House elections) and is largely on the side of bolder reform already. He believes the Democratic politicians need to have the courage of their convictions and they can make a real difference.

Once again, Howard Dean is right and Rahm Emanuel is wrong. The voters didn’t vote for a little bit of change. They gave the Democrats the White House and overwhelming majorities in the House and Senate. They voted for real change. The kind of change that Dean always pushes for (and often accomplishes) and the kind of change that Emanuel doesn’t ever find “realistic.”

Read the whole article here.

 

Related Articles:


A Minority President: Why the Polls Failed, And What the Majority Can Do

What’s next for the majority of voters who didn’t vote for Donald Trump? There are plenty of takeaways from the 2016 presidential election, but here is perhaps the most thorough examination of why the polls failed, why Hillary Clinton’s campaign failed, and what the majority of voters can do going forward. George Lakoff is the […] Read More

Prehistory of the Next American Revolution

What now? A new Revolution? If we are to counter the dangers both of corporate domination and of traditional forms of socialist statism, decentralization is essential—both of economic institutions and of political structure. We are at a point in our nation’s history that could, decades from now, be taught as the prehistory of the next […] Read More

The Seven-Point Protocol for a Lean Economy

In the future, what will our local economies look like? How will they function if there is little, to no, state or national support? The late David Fleming envisioned a post-capitalistic society that we could call “deep local” — in which all needs are met at the local level — from income to social capital […] Read More

Happy Holidays from Chelsea Green Publishing!

Today we kick off our Holiday Sale — with 35% off every purchase at our online bookstore. Simply use the code CGS16 at checkout from now until the end of the year. Along with this great discount, we are offering free shipping on any order over $100*. Are there homesteaders or organic gardeners on your […] Read More

You won’t have a revolution if you don’t ask for one. So, what are you waiting for?

Get ready for the era of Big Organizing. In Rules for Revolutionaries, authors Becky Bond and Zack Exley lay out the 22 Rules the fueled the Bernie Sanders campaign and which provide a way forward for activists looking for ways to move forward post-Election Day. This model, which the authors call “Big Organizing” is the […] Read More
Follow us
Get every new post delivered to your inbox
Join millions of other followers
Powered By WPFruits.com